Search:

  Home  ::  Articles  :: Authors  ::  Forum  ::  Calendar  ::  Blogs  ::  Bookstore   ::  Contact Us  
 
View full articles with Premium Content Membership
Password:

Not a member? - Register Now!


Other articles by this author...
  • Non Sequitur in the Argument for the Canonical Approach to Scripture, A
  • 666: One Number or Three?
  • Apostles and Prophets as the Foundation of the Church (Eph 2:20), The
  • Are Christians Supposed to Tithe?
  • Book Review: James Tabor’s The Jesus Dynasty
  • Casting Down Modern Imaginations
  • Central Text in the Original Sin Controversy, The
  • Did the Early Scribes Understand John 9:3 Correctly?
  • Does God Play Scrabble?
  • Essenic Piety and the Epistle of James
  • Historical Howlers, Funny and Otherwise: Dan Brown's Backward Understanding of Gnosticism
  • Interpretive Key to the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse, The
  • Is Faith Contrary to Empirical Support?
  • Jesus and Elijah in Luke 4:16-30
  • Most Abused Verse in the Bible?, The
  • New Perspectivist Response to Simon Gathercole’s Christianity Today Article, A
  • Qumran Targum of Job as a Window into Second Temple Judaism, The: A Response to Randall Buth's "Where Is the Aramaic Bible at Qumran? Scripture Use in the Land of Israel"
  • Statistics behind “The Tomb”, The
  • Were the Pharisees “Legalistic”?
  • Western Captivity of the Apostle Paul, The
  • What Is Measured Out in Romans 12:3?
  • Historical Howlers, Funny and Otherwise: Dan Brown's Backward Understanding of Gnosticism

    by Jack Poirier

    Published: 09-May-2006; Revised: 18-Dec-2008


    "Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?!"

    Many readers from my generation probably remember the hilarious riposte by Bluto, a character in the movie Animal House: "Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?!" One could not ask for a funnier example of a historical howler than that, and John Belushi's performance made it even more hilarious. But historical howlers are not always funny. Consider, for example, the factual errors strewn throughout Dan Brown's runaway bestseller, The Da Vinci Code. The howlers and other factual errors in the middle chapters of that book are almost too numerous to count (on p. 234, there are sixteen errors in the space of just three small paragraphs!), and they are so absurd that debunking the book's virtual history has been compared to shooting fish in a barrel. Unfortunately, probably only a fraction of that novel's readers are any the wiser, and that is why these howlers are ultimately not funny. They will be even less funny when the movie comes out.[1]

    As I use the term, I do not refer to every factual error as a "howler." When one of Brown's characters (on p. 234) says that the Dead Sea Scrolls were discovered in the 1950's, or refers to the writings discovered at Nag Hammadi in 1945 as "scro



    To view the remainder of this article, please log in at the top of this page.
    OR


    OR
    If you are not yet a Premium Content subscriber, please consider this amazing tool for Bible study. Premium Content membership gives you access to hundreds of articles, written by many of the best New Testament scholars in Israel and abroad, which illuminated Jesus' sayings. (Read our free sample articles!)
    New articles are continually being added to this database of knowledge. Articles are searchable by keyword, category or scripture reference.

    Articles published by Jerusalem Perspective Online express the views of their authors, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Jerusalem Perspective Online, David Bivin or other members of the Jerusalem School of Synoptic Research.

    Copyright 1987 - 2010  Jerusalem Perspective. All rights reserved.
    Click to find other articles with same subject categories:
  • Reviews
  • Church Fathers
  • Gnosticism
  • Gospel of John
  • Heresies
  • Johannine Epistles
  • New Testament Theology
  • Women and Femininity

  • All bookstore transactions are secure through encryption and all private information is kept strictly confidential.